Work-related II, Parallel Space

If we extend this principle infinitely, there must exist a world with a Planck constant that is not the one we recognize. For instance, if we denote the value of the Planck constant in our known world as "1"—that is, the "Planck constant"—and if the value of the Planck constant in another world is "2", then that world is based on a Planck constant of "2". Moreover, there are countless possible values between "1" and "2", suggesting that the potentially parallel worlds should be infinite. However, why do we not see them or feel their presence? If their positions overlap, would we not encounter each other without seeing one another? The answer is negative. The most direct example illustrating the relationship between the two is the distinction between odd and even numbers. Odd and even numbers do not intersect; they exist in parallel forever. Thus, when they meet, they can pass through each other's sequences without obstruction, meaning they cannot perceive one another, nor can they collide. Similarly, two worlds with different Planck constants are like a row of odd numbers and a row of even numbers, separated by the differing minimum units of energy, preventing any perception of each other and making collision impossible.

When discussing causality, we think of the "butterfly effect." According to an explanation found online, "a butterfly in the Amazon River basin of South America flapping its wings occasionally may trigger a tornado in Texas, USA. The reason is that the movement of the butterfly's wings causes changes in the surrounding air and atmospheric systems, leading to the generation of weak air currents. These weak air currents can then induce corresponding changes in the surrounding air or other systems, resulting in a chain reaction that ultimately leads to significant changes in other systems." From a dialectical perspective: all things are universally interconnected. If we trace the origin of the universe back to a big bang, then the kinetic energy, direction, speed, and other factors at that moment determined everything that happened thereafter, perhaps even determining our births and deaths. Reflecting on this, our real world is indeed filled with immense intrigue

Regarding the "grandmother paradox," it can also be considered that the universe contains countless parallel spaces, which in turn can generate innumerable parallel times. Even if we unfortunately kill our grandmother, I cannot exist in this spacetime, while another version of my grandmother in a different spacetime is still alive, thus I continue to exist. In this sense, there is no distinction between "preceding" and "succeeding" in parallel universes; all matter is in motion and differentiation occurs continuously. Even down to a single particle, differentiation happens at every moment, and the world is thus in a constant state of differentiation. For instance, when walking, I may encounter two paths ahead of me at any moment, and I am contemplating whether to choose the left or the right path. Consequently, the world splits into two based on my choice: one version of me takes the left path, while another takes the right. This differentiation determines the potential fate of my world. The version of me who chooses the left may encounter a beggar, prompting the world to differentiate again as I must decide whether to give alms; the version of me who chooses the right may meet a young lady, thus creating an opportunity to walk alongside her. Isn't it fascinating? Fate yields different outcomes based on choices.

This may seem like nonsense, yet experts argue that the imaginations presented in science fiction films should not be dismissed as such, because these imaginations, even if lacking scientific basis, can influence science by expanding people's creativity. If we delve deeper, the world created in "Cosmic Chase" can indeed involve concepts from quantum physics

There is a famous electronic double-slit experiment in which an electron passes through the slits, and the position it appears on the screen is not the direct projection of the slits, but rather deflected at an angle. When many electrons accumulate, interference patterns emerge, as if these electrons simultaneously passed through both slits and produced interference phenomena. However, if we install detectors in each slit, the electrons will only choose one slit to pass through, and no interference phenomenon will occur. How can we explain this strange phenomenon? Physicists have also proposed the concept of "parallel universes." They believe that the electron actually passes through both slits simultaneously; it just happens that in our universe it passes through one slit, while in another universe it passes through the other, thus compensating for the state that is missing in this world. It is very likely that parallel universes exist and are documented, but we currently cannot confirm this through experiments. They believe that the electron actually passes through both slits simultaneously; it just happens that in our universe it passes through one slit, while in another universe it passes through the other, thus compensating for the state that is missing in this world. It is very likely that parallel universes exist and are documented, but we currently cannot confirm this through experiments.

However, nothing is constant, as there is also uncertainty in quantum physics. For instance, when an electron collides with a proton, it may deflect to the left or to the right. Due to the inability to grasp this uncertainty, the two possibilities of the electron deflecting to the left or to the right give rise to two parallel universes.

The so-called Planck constant is the most fundamental unit of energy representation. On this planet where we exist, every substance has a unit that is indivisible, which we typically represent as an atom. Similarly, every substance possesses energy, with some having greater energy and others having less. Therefore, energy should also have a minimum unit, which physics refers to as the Planck constant. The energy contained in any substance is an integer multiple of the Planck constant, although this is limited to the world we inhabit. Thus, energy should also have a minimum unit, which physics refers to as the Planck constant. The energy contained in any substance is an integer multiple of the Planck constant, although this is limited to the world we inhabit

Although theoretically such spacetime can generate an infinite number of instances, it cannot truly extract multiple values like odd and even numbers. By solving the Planck constant equation, scientists can only derive a few reasonable solutions to the equation, from which several potentially existing parallel spaces can be constructed. However, under the influence of uncertainties in quantum physics, these parallel spaces may also be unstable, and if they are composed of these uncertain Planck constants, there exists the possibility of their extinction

This phenomenon of time and space travel has altered the history of timelines and charts, leading to the emergence of a new parallel world known as the "Post-Position Parallel Universe." Since there is a "post," there naturally must be a "pre." A typical example is found in "The Universe Chase Order," where the parallel universe inhabited by Jet Li is referred to as the "Pre-Position Parallel Universe." This implies that regardless of whether one engages in time and space displacement, an infinite number of universes already exist, and if one possesses the ability, one can traverse freely among them.

Let us first examine the famous "grandmother paradox." The essence of this paradox is as follows: if we were to travel back in time through a wormhole and encounter our grandmother, and unfortunately, we were to kill her, then since she would have died in her youth, from where would my future self originate? If I no longer exist, how could I return to the past to kill my grandmother? This creates a paradox. This paradox is based on Einstein's theory of general relativity. If I no longer exist, how could I return to the past to kill my grandmother? This creates a paradox. This paradox is based on Einstein's theory of general relativity. General relativity posits that our universe is interconnected through parallel dimensions, allowing for the possibility of returning to the past through wormholes. As envisioned, if time travel to the past is possible, it inevitably leads to the aforementioned paradox. In Einstein's theory of special relativity, we are also informed that time and space are interrelated; due to the constancy of the speed of light, all motion, including time itself, must correspond to it, thus making time relative. Consequently, to explain the aforementioned paradox, the concept of "parallel universes" was proposed, which is the basis of Hawking's "theory of parallel spaces." In Einstein's theory of special relativity, we are also informed that time and space are interrelated; due to the constancy of the speed of light, all motion, including time itself, must correspond to it, thus making time relative. Consequently, to explain the aforementioned paradox, the concept of "parallel universes" was proposed, which is the basis of Hawking's "theory of parallel spaces." Hawking explains that when time travelers return to the past and alter history, the timeline branches off, creating an alternate history. However, if we could return to the past, it might disrupt the laws of causality. Thus, the grandmother paradox is also explained in this manner: since time is related to space, the death of the grandmother causes the world to split into two due to the alteration of history, resulting in a branching of spacetime. However, if we could return to the past, it might disrupt the laws of causality. Thus, the grandmother paradox is also explained in this manner: since time is related to space, the death of the grandmother causes the world to split into two due to the alteration of history, resulting in a branching of spacetime. In this space, I would not exist, but the grandmother in another space would still exist, and thus I would still exist.

If we explain the current universe from the perspective of the Planck constant, it becomes easier to argue for the possibility of the existence of parallel universes

Since the theory of humans returning to the past is theoretically valid, "time machines" and "time travel" have become widely adopted themes in science fiction works. The concept of the "time machine" first appeared in H.G. Wells' novel "The Time Machine" in 1895, where it was merely the author's fantasy. It was not until the advent of special relativity and general relativity that this concept began to have a certain basis in physics, thus providing a scientific foundation for similar themes in science fiction films. Because of this scientific underpinning, there emerges an intriguing narrative between science and fantasy. For instance, in the science fiction comedy "Back to the Future," the protagonist Marty and Doc Brown travel through time using a time machine, interacting with people from different eras, which leads to branching timelines and creates outcomes different from the original timeline. In this film, the director vividly portrays the causal relationships resulting from historical changes that cause these branches, making this series of films a classic.